Second pass categorizing codes

At the August 13 AOM meeting, the subcommittee assigned the remaining messages to the categories defined at the July meeting. We also redrafted descriptions of reject codes which had previously been identified as lacking clarity.

The table below shows the streamlined codes with categories. Descriptions that appear in italics were revised for this iteration as well. Codes that appear in italics were either revised for clarity or added to fill gaps.

Operational conflicts
AGE
Instruction Too Old to Process
 
ATIM
Account Terminated IM
 
NUM
Account number change
 
TLTC
Too late to cancel
Other
OTH
Other
Reference data
INV
Invalid Information
 
UNA
Unknown Account
 
UNS
Unknown Sponsor
 
UNSP
Unknown Program
  UNIS Unknown Investment Style
  UNIM Unknown Investment Manager
 
UNC
Unknown Custodian
 
BNK
Unknown FC/Team
Suitability/instruction terms
BMIN
Below Minimum Account Size
 
ERES
Excessive Restrictions
 
IPS
Investment Policy Not Acceptable
 
NSIS
Not Suitable For Investment Strategy
 
INF
Missing Information
 
MGN
Margin Account
 
NSG
Account does not have sufficient gains
 
NSL
Account does not have sufficient losses
 
NTM
No trades meeting per trade minimum
 
DVP
Delivery vs. Payment Not Acceptable
Technology/communications
SNR
System Not Ready
 
DUP
Duplicate message ID
Trades not allowed
TNA
Trade Not Allowed on Account
 
ACL
Account Closed
 
AHO
Account on Hold
 
OVP
Account Over-Invested
 
OVS
Account Over Sold
 
REO
Reorg Processing

At the next meeting, we'll continue to identify other types of rejection descriptions that should be represented, as well as matrix the reject codes with specific instruction types.